Something from March 06

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:21 pm

Two plants to find out. Too easy???

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:23 pm

For you it is easy but for us quite difficult-
pic 2 are stamens, I suppose, not an Asteraceae-
pic 3 seems to be a teratology of a well known plant?

an Asteraceae...(?)

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:58 pm

For A You suppose right, stamens yes, Asteracea no.
B should be normal for a well known plant, otherwise it would be a forgotten one, and Asteracea lies in the freezer.

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:05 am

pic 2:
is my interpretation correct that there are 2 flowerheads, each with many single flowers, like in the Apiaceae?

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:15 am

So sorry: no flower-heads!

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:18 am

pic 1: I prefer the idea of a Ranunculaceae or Rosaceae?
pic 2: Apiaceae or Dipsacaceae?
However: I FEEL STRANDED!

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:19 am

ok- pic 2: Rosaceae

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:25 am

R and ceae is correct!

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:27 am

yes- during a cigarette break I came to ...ubia...?

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:33 am

At first, when You answered, I had my doubts, if my identification was in order.
Yes: Rubiaceae

HC Weber · Post by **HC Weber** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:51 am

he he jackpot-you should know these ugly fruits from your socks and shoes during field trips, even in Germany (also I remember that you had it in flower in your quiz months ago)

IL-PINE · Post by **IL-PINE** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 12:23 pm

Heh, pic 2 reminds me of something perverse

I must stop thinking in these lines

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 12:52 pm

Pine: so small and so ugly bristly like Galium aparine fruits?? Poor guy, I do not begrudge you for your memories

ok- let`s stop the fantasies now (greenhorn is watching us)

Sdravko · Post by **Sdravko** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:27 pm

seems some people dont do much fieldwork nowadays so they need time to recognize such a hostile plant

IL-PINE · Post by **IL-PINE** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:30 pm

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:38 pm

Now back to another male subject: I overview the 10.18 answer from Jackpot. Neither Roses nor Buttercups for him today!!!

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:16 pm

but am I right with pic 2 (Galium aparine, with the help of HC Weber?)

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:21 pm

I think I also need a help with pic 1 - no Asteraceae, Ranunculaceae, Rosaceae, 1 flower, stamens in tetrades ...hmmm...

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:35 pm

Yessir: Galium aparine.

And about the other one I was sure, You would see at the first view, what it is, for there is an older book, which gave me the idea, to make a pic like this.

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:09 am

flower belongs to a tree?

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:20 pm

No tree! Too high for 160 cm greenhorn.

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:00 am

family starts with a C

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:23 pm

If it did not get a new Family-name in the last 5 years, no C.

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:43 pm

he he, where are the other forum people? More ideas???

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:20 pm

greenhorn- shame on me: I have no idea more !!!!

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:29 pm

greenhorn- I propose a deal: you send to me an email with the name of this plant and I send to you an email with the name of my spatha plant- then, we both will be celebrated applaudable by the forum people

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:37 pm

No ugly mails on holy Sunday-evening!!!
Could be, You spend a bit of time not only for Your newest books.

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:47 pm

greenhorn · Post by **greenhorn** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:05 pm

The start into the new week: the same object a bit higher.

jackpot · Post by **jackpot** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:28 am

ahh, ok, very easy now! I had the idea at the very first time and compared it with my pics (high magnification of no. 013

) but the structures were different (possibly due to the age) and, I dont know why, I kept in my mind that you did say 1 flower (but you did not)- so my fault.